Skip to main content

Types of Orbits

 Types of Orbits

The orbits of satellites that might be used for personal communications systems

can be grouped into four categories: low Earth orbit (LEO), medium Earth

orbit (MEO), geostationary orbit (GEO), and elliptical Earth orbit (EEO).

Each has advantages and disadvantages in PCS designs. Table 5.1 shows sample

orbital elements for each of the satellite orbit types in units suitable for use with

most of the general-purpose orbital-prediction computer programs.

The Iridium (Iridium is a trademark of Iridium, LLC) system [11, 12] is a

LEO constellation of 66 satellites (plus 6 in-orbit spares) approximately 778 km

above the Earth in six equally spaced orbital planes at nearly 86.4° inclination to

the equator. Every point on Earth is in view of this “infrastructure in the sky,”

and the system is planned as a complement, or adjunct, to the existing “islands”

of terrestrial communications infrastructures.

The MEO characteristics are typified by the Global Positioning Satellite

(GPS) system of 24 satellites occupying six orbital planes inclined about 54.8°

from the equator and at an altitude of about 20,000 km. The GPS satellites are

spaced so that at least four are simultaneously visible from each point on Earth.

Although the GPS system is not a communications system, GPS receivers are

increasingly being included in personal communications devices. The GPS

system is often selected for time keeping and site synchronization in multiple-

transmitter terrestrial systems.


Orbital Elements for Four Types of Satellite Orbits

Orbital Element LEO MEO GEO EEO

Satellite Iridium GPS INTELSAT Molniya

Epoch

(revolution of epoch)

2006

231.40822226

(rev 48,635)

2006

230.32290049

(rev 11,658)

2006

230.72851175

(rev 74,158)

2006

230.72851175

(rev 412)

Orbital inclination 86.4009° 54.76780° 0.01080° 62.08880°

RAAN 171.4706° 263.9384° 1.62870° 214.5329°

Argument of perigee 77.8669° 155.0343° 148.7212° 266.2404°

Eccentricity 0.0002548 0.0097258 0.00026580 0.7242485

Mean anomaly 282.2821° 205.50360° 129.1125° 16.2853°

Mean motion 14.34216969 2.00563941 1.00274158 2.00707324

Drag –0.00000e–000 –0.00000e–000 –0.00000e–000 0.00000e–000


Satellites that are in orbits having a period of one sidereal day are referred

to as having a geosynchronous orbit. If, additionally, the inclination of the orbit

with respect to the equator is nearly zero and the orbital path is highly circular,

the orbit appears stationary to an observer on the Earth. Such an orbit is called a

geostationary orbit, or GEO).  lists the orbital parameters of the

INTELSAT satellite as an example of a GEO satellite.

Sometimes, highly elliptical orbits are chosen for communications because

of certain desirable geometric relationships between the orbit and the intended

coverage area. The EEO of the Molniya satellite is an example. The Molniya sat-

ellites were designed to provide television coverage to the high latitudes of Sibe-

ria in Russia since those high latitudes are not well covered by the equatorial

geostationary satellites. The Molniya orbits are highly eccentric, having approxi-

mately one-half sidereal-day period paths, which appear at apogee over Siberia

for a useful six-hour operational period. There is a second apogee over Hudson

Bay, Canada. When viewed from a fixed point on Earth, the orbital track

appears to make a somewhat distorted, open-ended “U” shape with the Earth

tucked in just above the curved part of the “U.” The two open ends are, respec-

tively, about 41,000 km above Siberia and Hudson Bay. Because at apogee the

orbit appears from Earth to be slow moving, very modest tracking capabilities

are required. Four satellites can provide essentially continuous coverage over the

high latitudes of one hemisphere of the Earth. The Molniya satellites have been

in service since 1963, but their future in the Russian television service is

uncertain.


Big LEO Systems

The three big LEO systems, Globalstar, Iridium, and Odyssey, are the first to be

licensed in the United States, and they have agreed to cooperate in an effort to

secure global authorizations for the portions of the radio frequency spectrum to

be used by their mobile phones. Globalstar and Odyssey, which employ

CDMA, or code division multiple access, share a segment of spectrum for their

mobile links. That spectrum segment can accommodate other global systems

employing compatible technologies. Iridium is a TDMA, or time division mul-

tiple access, system and uses a separate segment for its mobile links. The agree-

ment conforms with the International Telecommunication Union’s frequency

authorizations for global mobile systems.

Globalstar LP, based in San Jose, California, is a partnership of 12 interna-

tional telecommunications service providers and equipment manufacturers that

are building a global mobile satellite telephone system to be operational in 1998.

Globalstar’s dual-mode (cellular-satellite) handsets will be compatible with the

world’s existing cellular and wire-line networks. Globalstar will sell access to the

Globalstar system to a worldwide network of regional and local telecommunica-

tions service providers, including its strategic partners.

Iridium, LLC, is an international consortium of leading telecommunica-

tions and industrial companies funding the development of the Iridium system.

The Iridium system is a 66-satellite telecommunications network designed to

provide global wireless services to hand-held telephones and pagers virtually

anywhere in the world. The first five Iridium satellites were successfully

launched from Vandenburg Air Force Base on May 5, 1997, at 1855 UTC on

board a Delta II vehicle; this was followed by the launch of seven more satellites

on a Proton vehicle from Baikonur, Kazakhstan at 1402 UTC on June 18,

1997. Iridium, LLC, has since gone through a reorganization.

Odyssey Telecommunications International, Inc., (OTI), which has TRW

and Teleglobe as initial shareholders, was to develop a constellation of 12

Odyssey satellites orbiting approximately 10,354 km above the globe. The pro-

ject was cancelled, and the license has been returned.

The reorganization of Iridium, LLC, and the demise of Odyssey under-

score the difficulty of the economics model for communications satellites. This

is particularly true as terrestrial mobile phone technology becomes more and

more pervasive globally.





!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your happy 


Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  happy
!!! Please!!! 
!enter!
Your comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 








A NEW SYSTEM OF ALTERNATING CURRENT MOTORS





https://secretfocustips.blogspot.com/2023/01/basic-radiowave-and-antenna-parameters.html




https://secretfocustips.blogspot.com/2023/01/frequency-selection.html





https://secretfocustips.blogspot.com/2023/01/half-wave-and-quarter-wave-antennas.html





https://secretfocustips.blogspot.com/p/understanding-customer-journey.html





https://secretfocustips.blogspot.com/p/finding-sources-of-information-and.html





https://secretfocustips.blogspot.com/p/rules-factors-for-link-building.html



=================

Focus On Early Secret 


================




👀 Read carefully 👀


=====Thanks====



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE TESLA KOTATING MAGNETIC FIELD. MOTORS WITH CLOSED CONDUCTORS. SYNCHRONIZING MOTORS. KOTATING FIELD TRANSFORMERS

 THE TESLA KOTATING MAGNETIC FIELD. MOTORS WITH CLOSED CONDUCTORS. SYNCHRONIZING MOTORS. KOTATING FIELD TRANSFORMERS. THE best description that can be given of what he attempted, and succeeded in doing, with the rotating magnetic field, is to be found in Mr. Tesla's brief paper explanatory of his rotary cur- rent, polyphase system, read before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, in New York, in May, 1888, under the title " A New System of Alternate Current Motors and Trans- formers." As a matter of fact, which a perusal of the paper will establish, Mr. Tesla made no attempt in that paper to de- scribe all his work. It dealt in reality with the few topics enu- merated in the caption of this chapter. Mr. Tesla's reticence was no doubt due largely to the fact that his action was gov- erned by the wishes of others with whom lie was associated, but it may be worth mention that the compiler of this volume who had seen the motors running, and who was then ...

A New System of Alternating Current Motors

A New System of Alternating Current Motors Introduction : In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the development of electrical engineering revolutionized industries, transportation, and daily life. Central to this transformation was the discovery and utilization of alternating current (AC) motors. These motors, as opposed to direct current (DC) motors, offered several advantages, including increased efficiency, longer transmission distances, and more straightforward regulation. In this article, we will delve into the historical context of AC motors, the key contributions of various inventors, and the development of a new system of alternating current motors that paved the way for the modern electrical era. Historical Context: The idea of utilizing electrical power for practical applications was first demonstrated by Michael Faraday in the early 1830s when he discovered electromagnetic induction. Faraday's work laid the foundation for the understanding of the relationship betw...

FREQUENCY SELECTION.

 FREQUENCY SELECTION. 1. Prior to selecting frequencies for a radio circuit, thought must be given as to what type of antenna will be used. Often, during displacement or during an alert, at least two types of antennas will be used -- a whip while moving; a doublet or suitable compromise antenna while mobile at a halt. Antenna selection will determine the choice of frequency, not the other way around. Looking at the various Immediate Sky-Wave Distance (ISD) charts, page 125 to page 141 (we will use column 5 on the charts) for various antennas, we see that the most reliable antenna is a doublet with reliability dropping until we reach the poorest antenna -- the whip. We also see on the ISD charts that for the same distance, the frequency increases with each type of antenna, with the whip having the highest frequency. What conclusions can we draw from these comparisons? First, we must have two frequencies for sky wave use -- a day and a night frequency. Also, when forced to use a whip...